Asbestos Lawsuit Tops Out At $3.5 Million

4572 Readers 8 Feedbacks
Injury Lawyer

The family of a lady who passed away of mesothelioma supposedly due to secondary asbestos exposure, has been given $3.5 million in their lawsuit contrary to the Tennessee Valley Authority. The lady’s husband breathe his last from asbestos-related disease almost 20 years ago.

Asbestos Lawsuit tops at .5 Million conferring to Al (10/6/15), the family of Barbara Bobo funneled their lawsuit claiming Barbara was unprotected to asbestos fibers while washing her husband’s work outfits over the period of about 20 years. James Bobo, Barbara’s husband, operated in asbestos cleaning up at Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, maintained by the Tennessee Valley Authority. James Bobo passed away of lung cancer related to asbestos exposure in 1997. In 2011, Barbara Bobo undergo surgical procedure to remove the coating in her lung and then underwent chemotherapy.

Subordinate asbestos exposure happens when the person is not exposed to asbestos over his or her own work but when he or she derives into contact with asbestos from a new source. For example on the clothing of somebody who works with asbestos. Lawsuits have been prepared in contradiction of companies claiming people developed serious, fatal diseases as a result of subordinate asbestos exposure. Asbestos is connected to asbestosis, mesothelioma and lung cancer, all irredeemable diseases.

As with primary asbestos exposure, warning sign of secondary asbestos exposure can take years to grow, making it problematic to identify where initial asbestos exposure happened.

In the meantime, plaintiffs who have earlier declared bankruptcy may still be capable to file an asbestos lawsuit. Rendering to The Legal Intelligencer (10/7/15), a federal judge permitted a series of asbestos cases to move frontward, despite the fact the defendants filed for summary judgment. The complainants were allegedly part of an asbestos MDL but their assertions were discharged in 1997. After that, they go in to bankruptcy lawsuit only to have their asbestos cases reestablished. The perpetrators claimed that the asbestos lawsuit should be discharged since it was not contained within in the bankruptcy litigation.

The judge declared that the accusers had no way of knowing that a new judge would restore the lawsuits more than 10 years later they were dismissed. And thus, the failure to consist the asbestos litigation in the bankruptcy litigation was not bad trust. Ultimately, even though Barbara died in 2013, her family will obtain $3.5 million for her pain and distress, in addition to the medical expenditures.

 

Powered By: Injury Lawyer News

 

8 Comments
  1. J Baker

    June 29, 2014 at 9:12 pm

    As with other types of accidents, figuring out who is at fault in a traffic accident is a matter of deciding who was negligent. In many cases, your instincts will tell you that a driver, cyclist or pedestrian acted carelessly, but not what rule or rules that person violated. An attorney will look to a number of sources to help you determine who was at fault for your accident, such as police reports, state traffic laws, and witnesses.

  2. Harold Robertson

    June 30, 2014 at 3:35 pm

    In a number of states that have enacted mandatory helmet statutes, the laws either: (1) provide only for criminal penalties, or (2) do not state what effect a violation has on the determination of whether a motorcyclist was negligent. Thus, in these jurisdictions, and in those that do not have helmet laws, the effect of a motorcyclist’s failure to wear a helmet on the determination of his negligence is unsettled. In such states, the failure to wear a helmet may be found to constitute negligence on the part of a motorcyclist, or may be relevant to the issue of injuries and damages where it appears the failure to wear a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist’s injuries.

  3. Ronald Bradson

    July 1, 2014 at 9:15 pm

    In addition to physical damages, mental impairment and emotional damage suffered by many victims of life-changing ATV injuries may be severe. Similarly, TBI victims will require a lifetime of chronic care, together with extensive rehabilitation and the use of expensive assistive technologies, including augmentative and alternative communication devices.

  4. Collin Schmidt

    July 2, 2014 at 7:26 am

    Sometimes the information provided in a police report may be inaccurate. Fortunately, it’s possible to amend a police report in certain circumstances. While amending a factual error in a report is a relatively simple process, amending a disputed fact, such as who was at fault, is typically much more difficult.

  5. Kevin Sean

    July 3, 2014 at 11:45 am

    A pedestrian must exercise reasonable care for his or her own safety. The care required must be proportionate to the danger to be avoided and reasonably anticipated consequences. Contributory negligence may be assessed against a pedestrian if they failed to exercise such care and contributed to the cause of their own injuries.

  6. Sherry Fordman

    July 4, 2014 at 4:56 pm

    Because attorneys are aware of the many laws governing legal responsibility, an attorney can help you identify who might be held responsible for your injuries, including people or businesses you might not have considered.

  7. Anthony Bedford

    July 5, 2014 at 1:42 pm

    If you or a loved one has suffered a car accident injury, some important questions need to be answered. Reviewing your claim with an attorney can help you identify who, if anyone, was negligent and if that negligence caused your injury. That’s why a good first step is to contact an auto accident attorney for a free claim evaluation. An attorney can evaluate the merits of your case and help you decide on the next logical step.

  8. Gary Mcneil

    July 6, 2014 at 2:33 am

    Despite a lack of support among some motorcyclists, a number of states have enacted statutes requiring the use of protective equipment when riding a motorcycle. Some of these laws require that a motorcycle rider and/or his or her passenger wear equipment such as goggles or face shields, but most common (and most controversial) are those laws that require the wearing of a helmet.

Leave a Review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *